Sunday, September 30, 2012

Golf Tournament Raises Money for Wounded Veterans

About 100 Georgian golfers hit the course at Southern Hills Golf and Country Club Friday for it's second annual Heroes Invitational Tournament to benefit Birdies for the Brave, a PGA charity that aids wounded service men and women.

The tournament started patriotically with the Star Spangled Banner. State Representative Austin Scott was on hand to welcome the golfers and speak about supporting some of America's wounded heroes.

Golfers paid $200 a ticket to participate.

13WMAZ caught up with Kurt Rothe of Brunswick. He hurt his back in Afghanistan in 2008 when an IED hit his group of National Guardsmen. Rothe said that he has had seven surgeries on his back since coming back to the United States.

"I had a surgery four months ago, so this is my second time out playing golf since the surgery," said Rothe.

Rothe said as someone who has been helped by the Wounded Warriors project, he knows that the money raised at the tournament goes to help provide services for military men and women.

You get a little bit of survivor's guilt. You look at the friends that you lost there, and a lot of them you consider your brothers. You come back, you reintegrate, and you're here," said Rothe. "It's a tough transition. You are getting back to normal life. It's a new normal, it's not what you had normal before you deployed before you went through what you went through in Afghanistan or Iraq."

Last year, they raised $62,000 for the wounded veterans organization.

You can follow Austin Lewis on Twitter at?@austin13wmaz

Source: http://bleckleydodgepulaski.13wmaz.com/news/military/76467-golf-tournament-raises-money-wounded-veterans

macaroni and cheese festivus festivus

Saturday, September 29, 2012

Consumer Report: Getting Good Health Insurance

Finding a good health insurance plan is one of the most important decisions you can make. And it?s just gotten a lot easier. Insurers are now required to use a new form that describes in plain English deductibles and other costs. For the first time, every plan will have a form that looks exactly the same, which will make it much easier to compare them side by side.

Consumer Reports is also releasing an analysis of almost a 1,000 health care plans to help consumers choose the best options. Consumer Reports analyzed 984 private, Medicare and Medicaid health-insurance plans ranked by the National Committee for
Quality Assurance, or NCQA, a nonprofit accreditation organization. The rankings take a number of factors into consideration, including customer satisfaction and how good a job the plan does on treatment and prevention.

On the plus side, the quality of care has improved. But Consumer Reports says there are troubling trends as well. There are treatments and tests that have been shown not to be helpful, yet research shows many are still being overused. That?s not only a waste of money, but you could end up getting treatments that are unnecessary, and
sometimes even dangerous.

Turns out the providers of the top ten private plans are all non-profits which means they don?t have to worry about turning a profit for investors, they only have to worry about pleasing their customers. In the rankings, big name for-profit companies-- UnitedHealthcare, Aetna, and Humana--had more private plans at the bottom than at
the top.

A note about the rankings Consumer Reports used in its analysis ? insurance company plans that are accredited by the NCQA are allotted a certain number of points. Not all insurance plans are accredited ? and some are accredited by another organization.
There is a fee involved for any accreditation. Consumer Reports says getting accredited is an important step because it shows insurers are willing to report on their plans performance and that has led to improved performance.

Source: http://www.wilx.com/home/headlines/Consumer-Report-Getting-Good-Health-Insurance-171612661.html

jersey shore season 5 mark driscoll unemployment rate unemployment rate jesse ventura keri russell drew barrymore

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Obama takes world stage to fend off Romney attacks

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - Taking a detour from the campaign trail to the world stage, President Barack Obama sought on Tuesday to counter attacks on his foreign policy record from Republican rival Mitt Romney on everything from the Iranian nuclear standoff to U.S.-Israeli relations to the Arab Spring.

At the podium of the cavernous U.N. General Assembly hall six weeks before the U.S. election, Obama addressed both American voters and world leaders, as he defended his approach to global challenges that have started piling up in the final stretch of a close presidential race.

Obama's stern warning to Iran over its nuclear program was meant not only for the mullahs in Tehran and for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has pressed Washington to take a tougher tack, but also for pro-Israel voters who could help sway the election in battleground states like Florida and Ohio.

His challenge to the fast-changing Arab world to embrace democratic values of free speech and tolerance and reject the kind of anti-U.S. violence that has swept the region in recent weeks was a clear rebuttal to Republican accusations that he has apologized for America and weakened its global standing.

"I accept that people are going to call me awful things every day," Obama said, in a comment that could be read as referring to both flag-burning protesters in Islamabad and political opponents at home. "And I will defend their right to do so."

The line drew laughter from an audience that otherwise sat in mostly polite but stoic silence.

With Obama headed to battleground Ohio on Wednesday, and Romney arriving there on Tuesday for a bus tour with vice presidential running mate Paul Ryan, both presidential campaigns are likely to return to bread-and-butter economic messages.

But foreign policy and America's world standing have become more of a factor in the campaign during the last two weeks, as the Muslim world has been roiled by protests over a film mocking the Prophet Mohammed. The issues dominated the day.

Sensing an opening, Romney and Ryan have escalated their attacks on the president's handling of world events.

And after Obama's U.N. address, the Republican camp made clear they weren't letting up.

Eric Cantor, Republican majority leader in the House of Representatives, said Obama's foreign policy is "rudderless."

Paula Dobriansky, a Romney foreign policy adviser, was more specific.

"President Obama listed the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, Syria, and Iran as major challenges facing the international community," she said. "But those are three vital issues on which President Obama has unfortunately made no progress. The rhetoric doesn't match the policy."

SHORT CEASEFIRE

Before returning to the campaign trail, Romney and Obama observed a brief ceasefire in New York, with both men delivering statesmanlike speeches to Bill Clinton's global charity.

Romney told the Clinton Global Initiative, a foundation set up by the former Democratic president, that the United States should do more to encourage free enterprise as a way of creating jobs in the developing world.

The Republican largely avoided criticizing Obama in front of an audience that included many prominent Democrats. But his message that U.S. foreign aid frequently supplants private enterprise reflected one of his central complaints against the Obama administration.

"A temporary aid package can jolt an economy. It can fund some projects. It can pay some bills. It can employ some people some of the time," Romney said. "But it can't sustain an economy ? not for long."

Speaking at the same venue a few hours later, Obama outlined new steps to fight human trafficking.

Neither Romney nor Obama are likely to talk about foreign aid or human trafficking when they return to Ohio, a politically divided state that will be crucial in determining who wins the November 6 election.

With only six weeks until the vote, Romney is running out of time to gain ground on the incumbent president.

Obama widened his lead in the Reuters/Ipsos daily tracking poll to 7 percentage points over Romney, up 1 point from Monday. Obama now leads among likely voters 49 to 42 percent.

'DO WHAT WE MUST'

At the United Nations, Obama made his case in a statesmanlike way that struck a sharp contrast with the festive back-and-forth of campaign rallies that have come to occupy much of his time. But his message was still deeply infused with election-year politics.

Obama's annual visit followed protests over the anti-Islam video made in California that posed a huge dilemma for a U.S. leader who took office promising a "new beginning" with the Muslim world. He has also had to grapple with an escalating crisis in U.S.-Israeli relations over Iran's nuclear program and bloodshed in Syria, where President Bashar al-Assad remains in power despite Obama's demand that he step down.

Honing in on Iran, Obama warned that United States will "do what we must" to prevent it from acquiring a nuclear weapon and said time was running short for diplomacy.

That pledge fell far short of Netanyahu's demand that Obama set a "red line" that Tehran must not cross if it is to avoid military action, and it was unclear whether it would be enough to placate Netanyahu.

There was no immediate reaction to Obama's comments from Israeli leaders, with the country closed down for the holiest Jewish day of the year, Yom Kippur.

Obama also sought to reassure U.S. voters that he is doing everything he can to head off more violence like the recent September 11 attack in Libya that killed the U.S. ambassador and three of his colleagues.

Americans were stunned by recent images of U.S. flags again burning in the Muslim world, the focus of intense personal diplomacy by the president at the start of his term.

In his speech, he faced the delicate task of articulating U.S. distaste for insults to any religion while at the same time insisting there is no excuse for a violent reaction - a distinction rejected by many Muslims.

Obama defended his approach to the Arab Spring but offered no detailed solutions to an array of crises that threaten to chip away at a foreign policy record that his aides hoped would be immune from Republican attack during the run-up to Election Day.

Despite Obama's international woes, administration officials are heartened by Romney's own recent foreign policy stumbles and doubt that the president's critics will gain traction in a campaign that remains focused mainly on the U.S. economy.

With pressures building in the presidential race, Obama's brief final turn on the world stage left little doubt about his immediate priorities.

He skipped the customary one-on-one meetings with foreign counterparts but went ahead with the taping of a campaign-style appearance on ABC's popular television talk-show "The View."

However, after coming under Republican criticism for the tradeoff, the White House said Obama did meet briefly with Yemen's new president, Abd-Rabbu Mansour Hadi. Obama dropped in on talks he was having with a senior U.S. aide and thanked him for helping protect U.S. diplomats during recent unrest in the country.

(Writing by Matt Spetalnick, Additional reporting by Steve Holland and Crispian Balmer in Jerusalem. Editing by Warren Strobel, Will Dunham and Christopher Wilson)

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/obama-detours-campaign-trail-world-stage-050526567.html

49ers vs giants

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

The Kill Zone: The Movie Deal

When I was asked to join this great group of writers to blog on a regular basis, I bet they didn?t think I?d kick things off by writing about movies. But I?d guess my Kill Zone colleagues would agree that one of the most commonly asked questions we get as writers is, ?When is your book going to be made into a movie??

This very question came up in my panel session at the Northwest Bookfest today. For better or worse, movies are more universal cultural touchstones than books. They?re easier to consume and many more people have seen them. When someone at a writers? conference asks me what my books are like, I usually mention that they would appeal to readers of Clive Cussler or James Rollins. But at a party I say that they?re akin to an Indiana Jones or James Bond movie because I can always be confident that people will get the comparison.

When readers turn the tables and ask about my books becoming movies, I have a hard time formulating a pithy answer. Although I struggle to come up with a meaningful response, it?s flattering for readers to ask. It means that they thought my adventure novel was cinematic in its action, descriptions, and pacing and that they want to spend more time with the characters. It?s the ultimate expression of success for a book to be deemed worthy of the silver screen, but for a novelist the situation is complicated.

A good movie can help cement an author?s career, such as it did with John Grisham?s The Firm, which was bought by Hollywood before he even sold the literary rights. It could also faceplant along the lines of Clive Cussler?s Sahara or Janet Evanovich?s One for the Money. I?d risk the flop for a shot at a hit. The problem is that I don?t know when or if a film will ever happen. While I?m in full control of my writing, I?m a bystander when it comes to having the book made into a movie.

Hollywood has a well-deserved reputation for being a fickle town. The first time I got a call from my film rights agent that a production company was interested in one of my books, I was so pumped that I was already planning what to wear to the premiere before I?d even hung up the phone. Then came a whole bunch of nothin?. I have no idea what went on behind the scenes, but I never heard another peep. By the third time I got a nibble from a producer, I didn?t get excited because I understood that it was just the start of a long process, one which could get sidetracked at any point.

First comes the option. Although the rights can be bought outright, most books are purchased in two- or three-year options, during which the producer has the sole right to make the movie of your book. A novelist won?t get paid for the full amount of the contract until the day principal photography begins (because movies can be and have been canceled at any point up to that moment). However, if the movie isn?t made during that period, then the option rights revert back to the writer, who can sell them again. I know many writers who?ve optioned the same movie rights repeatedly for a decade or more, and the film still hasn?t been made.

That?s because the next step is finding a director, screenwriter, and actors to attach to the film.? If it?s got those, the movie is probably on the fast track to being filmed. If not, it?s likely to end up in ?development hell,? the no-man?s land where projects can languish while a script is rewritten multiple times to fix story, budget, or casting problems. For example, the movie Salt was originally supposed to star Tom Cruise until he bowed out and the script had to be completely rewritten for Angelina Jolie in the same role.

When people ask me who I think would be cast as the main characters in my books, I usually tell them it?s somebody who is currently in high school. Katherine Heigl, who played Stephanie Plum in One for the Money, was sixteen years old when that book was written, and Matthew McConaughey from Sahara was four when the Dirk Pitt series was created. Besides, casting is notoriously difficult. Who can possibly see Mickey Rourke as Axel Foley in Beverly Hills Cop, Will Smith as Neo in The Matrix, or Tom Selleck as Indiana Jones, even though they were all the first choices for those iconic roles?

My agent has another challenge in selling my books to Hollywood. When I write, I don?t have a budget. I can destroy hundreds of cars, blow up buildings with abandon, place scenes in exotic locations, and employ a cast of thousands, all of which cost me nothing but would translate into substantial outlays in a film for elaborate stunts, difficult location shoots, and expensive computer graphics. I?m sure one of the reasons that my books haven?t been made into movies yet is that they would cost two hundred million dollars to produce.

For me, the original question remains unanswerable. No film is on the foreseeable horizon, though it would be a blast to see my words come to life on the big screen. I will always be open to getting those nibbles from Hollywood. I do, however, have one condition: even if it?s as a henchman who dies in the first ten minutes, I want a speaking role in the movie. If it?s a flop, at least I?d get a Screen Actors Guild card out of it.

Source: http://killzoneauthors.blogspot.com/2012/09/the-movie-deal.html

pat robertson hunger games trailer hunger games trailer in plain sight hunger games movie review bats hunger games review